Peer Review Process

The Journal of Informatics and Advanced Data Science (JIADS) follows a double-blind peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and scientific integrity of all submitted manuscripts.

Review Procedure

• All submitted manuscripts are initially evaluated by the editorial board to ensure relevance to the journal scope and compliance with submission guidelines.

• Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two independent expert reviewers in the relevant field.

• The identities of authors and reviewers remain confidential throughout the review process.

• Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on originality, scientific contribution, methodology, clarity, relevance, and ethical standards.

• Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the editorial board may:

  • Accept the manuscript

  • Request minor revisions

  • Request major revisions

  • Reject the manuscript

Review Ethics

• Reviewers must provide objective, constructive, and unbiased feedback.

• Reviewers must maintain confidentiality regarding submitted manuscripts.

• Reviewers should disclose any conflicts of interest before accepting a review assignment.

• Editors make final publication decisions based on reviewers’ evaluations and the journal’s academic standards.

The journal is committed to a fair, transparent, and timely peer review process to maintain high-quality scholarly publication standards.